AOD vs BBEM

Quick Verdict

BBEM has a lower expense ratio. AOD delivered stronger 1-year returns. BBEM offers more diversification with 889 holdings.

Lower Fees: BBEMHigher Returns: AODMore Diversified: BBEM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAODBBEMWinner
Expense Ratio1.16%0.15%
AUM$1.0B$748M
Dividend Yield11.72%2.52%
Holdings861,132
YTD Return+18.03%+15.82%
1Y Return+34.72%+32.69%
3Y Return (annualized)+22.88%+19.42%
5Y Return (annualized)+11.28%-
Volatility (annualized)21.9%15.1%
Max Drawdown-88.1%-17.4%
Fund FamilyAberdeenJ.P. Morgan Asset Management
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJan 26, 2007May 10, 2023

AOD vs BBEM Performance

Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) is a ETF from Aberdeen and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Over the past year AOD returned +34.72% while BBEM returned +32.69%. Year to date, AOD is up 18.03% versus a gain of 15.82% for BBEM.

Over three years, AOD compounded at +22.88% per year against +19.42% for BBEM. Across the full 3-year window we track, BBEM has the edge at +19.55% annualized vs -4.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

AOD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.9% compared with 15.1% for BBEM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -88.1% for AOD and -17.4% for BBEM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AOD charges 1.16% per year while BBEM charges 0.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $116 vs $15 annually, a gap of $101 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AOD currently yields 11.72% against 2.52% for BBEM.

Holdings Overlap

5.8%overlap

AOD and BBEM share 5 holdings out of 969 unique holdings combined, representing a 5.8% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in AODWeight in BBEMDifference
2330:TW3.15%12.87%9.72%
0700:KY1.86%3.54%1.68%
2317:TW1.06%0.68%0.38%
300750:SHProProPro
RAIL3:BVProProPro
See all 5 holdings AOD shares with BBEM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AOD or BBEM?

AOD has an expense ratio of 1.16% while BBEM charges 0.15%. BBEM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $101 per year of difference.

Which performed better, AOD or BBEM?

Over the past year AOD returned +34.72% vs +32.69% for BBEM, so AOD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), AOD annualized -4.05% vs +19.55% for BBEM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, AOD or BBEM?

AOD has been the more volatile fund at 21.9% annualized versus 15.1% for BBEM. Worst drawdown: AOD -88.1% vs BBEM -17.4%.

Should I hold both AOD and BBEM?

AOD and BBEM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between AOD and BBEM?

AOD and BBEM share 5 common holdings with a 5.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 969 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, AOD or BBEM?

AOD yields 11.72% while BBEM yields 2.52%, so AOD currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →