AOD vs GLOW
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund vs VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
GLOW has a lower expense ratio. AOD delivered stronger 1-year returns. AOD offers more diversification with 85 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOD | GLOW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | 0.72% | |
| AUM | $1.0B | $63M | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.72% | 1.28% | |
| Holdings | 86 | 16 | |
| YTD Return | +19.25% | +14.15% | |
| 1Y Return | +34.02% | +25.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.41% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.45% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.9% | 10.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -88.1% | -15.6% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Victory Capital Management Inc. | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2007 | Jun 21, 2024 |
AOD vs GLOW Performance
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) is a ETF from Aberdeen and VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF (GLOW) is a ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc.. Over the past year AOD returned +34.02% while GLOW returned +25.02%. Year to date, AOD is up 19.25% versus a gain of 14.15% for GLOW.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AOD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.9% compared with 10.7% for GLOW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -88.1% for AOD and -15.6% for GLOW. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AOD charges 1.16% per year while GLOW charges 0.72%. On a $10,000 position that is $116 vs $72 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AOD currently yields 11.72% against 1.28% for GLOW.
Holdings Overlap
AOD and GLOW share 0 holdings out of 100 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AOD or GLOW?
AOD has an expense ratio of 1.16% while GLOW charges 0.72%. GLOW is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $44 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AOD or GLOW?
Over the past year AOD returned +34.02% vs +25.02% for GLOW, so AOD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), AOD annualized -4.00% vs +19.61% for GLOW. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AOD or GLOW?
AOD has been the more volatile fund at 21.9% annualized versus 10.7% for GLOW. Worst drawdown: AOD -88.1% vs GLOW -15.6%.
Should I hold both AOD and GLOW?
AOD and GLOW have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AOD and GLOW?
AOD and GLOW share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 100 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AOD or GLOW?
AOD yields 11.72% while GLOW yields 1.28%, so AOD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.