AOD vs GTOS
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund vs Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF
Quick Verdict
GTOS has a lower expense ratio. AOD delivered stronger 1-year returns. GTOS offers more diversification with 703 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOD | GTOS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | 0.30% | |
| AUM | $1.0B | $124M | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.73% | 4.52% | |
| Holdings | 86 | 703 | |
| YTD Return | +18.25% | -0.74% | |
| 1Y Return | +33.04% | +1.17% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.83% | +4.69% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.44% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.9% | 1.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -88.1% | -1.8% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2007 | Dec 9, 2022 |
AOD vs GTOS Performance
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) is a ETF from Aberdeen and Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF (GTOS) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year AOD returned +33.04% while GTOS returned +1.17%. Year to date, AOD is up 18.25% versus a loss of 0.74% for GTOS.
Over three years, AOD compounded at +23.83% per year against +4.69% for GTOS. Across the full 4-year window we track, GTOS has the edge at +4.30% annualized vs -4.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AOD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.9% compared with 1.9% for GTOS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -88.1% for AOD and -1.8% for GTOS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AOD charges 1.16% per year while GTOS charges 0.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $116 vs $30 annually, a gap of $86 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AOD currently yields 11.73% against 4.52% for GTOS.
Holdings Overlap
AOD and GTOS share 0 holdings out of 344 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AOD or GTOS?
AOD has an expense ratio of 1.16% while GTOS charges 0.30%. GTOS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $86 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AOD or GTOS?
Over the past year AOD returned +33.04% vs +1.17% for GTOS, so AOD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), AOD annualized -4.03% vs +4.30% for GTOS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AOD or GTOS?
AOD has been the more volatile fund at 21.9% annualized versus 1.9% for GTOS. Worst drawdown: AOD -88.1% vs GTOS -1.8%.
Should I hold both AOD and GTOS?
AOD and GTOS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AOD and GTOS?
AOD and GTOS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 344 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AOD or GTOS?
AOD yields 11.73% while GTOS yields 4.52%, so AOD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.