AOD vs IG
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund vs Principal Investment Grade Corporate ETF
Quick Verdict
IG has a lower expense ratio. AOD delivered stronger 1-year returns. IG offers more diversification with 145 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOD | IG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | 0.19% | |
| AUM | $1.0B | $198M | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.72% | 5.07% | |
| Holdings | 86 | 248 | |
| YTD Return | +18.03% | -1.54% | |
| 1Y Return | +34.72% | +0.84% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.88% | +4.56% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.28% | -0.69% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.9% | 8.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -88.1% | -23.8% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Principal Funds | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2007 | Apr 18, 2018 |
AOD vs IG Performance
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) is a ETF from Aberdeen and Principal Investment Grade Corporate ETF (IG) is a ETF from Principal Funds. Over the past year AOD returned +34.72% while IG returned +0.84%. Year to date, AOD is up 18.03% versus a loss of 1.54% for IG.
Over three years, AOD compounded at +22.88% per year against +4.56% for IG; over five years the annualized figures are +11.28% and -0.69% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, IG has the edge at +0.59% annualized vs -4.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AOD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.9% compared with 8.0% for IG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -88.1% for AOD and -23.8% for IG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AOD charges 1.16% per year while IG charges 0.19%. On a $10,000 position that is $116 vs $19 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AOD currently yields 11.72% against 5.07% for IG.
Holdings Overlap
AOD and IG share 1 holdings out of 229 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AOD | Weight in IG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GVMXX | 0.07% | 1.91% | 1.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AOD or IG?
AOD has an expense ratio of 1.16% while IG charges 0.19%. IG is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $97 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AOD or IG?
Over the past year AOD returned +34.72% vs +0.84% for IG, so AOD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), AOD annualized -4.05% vs +0.59% for IG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AOD or IG?
AOD has been the more volatile fund at 21.9% annualized versus 8.0% for IG. Worst drawdown: AOD -88.1% vs IG -23.8%.
Should I hold both AOD and IG?
AOD and IG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AOD and IG?
AOD and IG share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 229 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AOD or IG?
AOD yields 11.72% while IG yields 5.07%, so AOD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.