AOD vs PATN
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund vs Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF
Quick Verdict
PATN has a lower expense ratio. PATN delivered stronger 1-year returns. PATN offers more diversification with 101 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOD | PATN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | 0.65% | |
| AUM | $1.0B | $194M | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.72% | 1.59% | |
| Holdings | 86 | 106 | |
| YTD Return | +18.81% | +31.67% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.65% | +51.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.20% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.13% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.9% | 21.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -88.1% | -16.8% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Pacer ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2007 | Sep 16, 2024 |
AOD vs PATN Performance
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) is a ETF from Aberdeen and Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs. Over the past year AOD returned +32.65% while PATN returned +51.38%. Year to date, AOD is up 18.81% versus a gain of 31.67% for PATN.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AOD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.9% compared with 21.1% for PATN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -88.1% for AOD and -16.8% for PATN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AOD charges 1.16% per year while PATN charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $116 vs $65 annually, a gap of $51 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AOD currently yields 11.72% against 1.59% for PATN.
Holdings Overlap
AOD and PATN share 6 holdings out of 180 unique holdings combined, representing a 6.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AOD or PATN?
AOD has an expense ratio of 1.16% while PATN charges 0.65%. PATN is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $51 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AOD or PATN?
Over the past year AOD returned +32.65% vs +51.38% for PATN, so PATN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), AOD annualized -4.01% vs +38.86% for PATN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AOD or PATN?
AOD has been the more volatile fund at 21.9% annualized versus 21.1% for PATN. Worst drawdown: AOD -88.1% vs PATN -16.8%.
Should I hold both AOD and PATN?
AOD and PATN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AOD and PATN?
AOD and PATN share 6 common holdings with a 6.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 180 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AOD or PATN?
AOD yields 11.72% while PATN yields 1.59%, so AOD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.