AOD vs VGI
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund vs Virtus Global Multi-Sector Income Fund
Quick Verdict
AOD has a lower expense ratio. AOD delivered stronger 1-year returns. VGI offers more diversification with 434 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOD | VGI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | 1.74% | |
| AUM | $1.0B | $88M | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.72% | 11.98% | |
| Holdings | 86 | 646 | |
| YTD Return | +18.03% | +1.47% | |
| 1Y Return | +34.72% | +5.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.88% | +11.60% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.28% | +2.10% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.9% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -88.1% | -63.3% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Virtus Investment Partners | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2007 | Feb 23, 2012 |
AOD vs VGI Performance
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) is a ETF from Aberdeen and Virtus Global Multi-Sector Income Fund (VGI) is a ETF from Virtus Investment Partners. Over the past year AOD returned +34.72% while VGI returned +5.12%. Year to date, AOD is up 18.03% versus a gain of 1.47% for VGI.
Over three years, AOD compounded at +22.88% per year against +11.60% for VGI; over five years the annualized figures are +11.28% and +2.10% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VGI has the edge at -2.38% annualized vs -4.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AOD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.9% compared with 14.2% for VGI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -88.1% for AOD and -63.3% for VGI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AOD charges 1.16% per year while VGI charges 1.74%. On a $10,000 position that is $116 vs $174 annually, a gap of $58 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AOD currently yields 11.72% against 11.98% for VGI.
Holdings Overlap
AOD and VGI share 0 holdings out of 519 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AOD or VGI?
AOD has an expense ratio of 1.16% while VGI charges 1.74%. AOD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $58 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AOD or VGI?
Over the past year AOD returned +34.72% vs +5.12% for VGI, so AOD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), AOD annualized -4.05% vs -2.38% for VGI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AOD or VGI?
AOD has been the more volatile fund at 21.9% annualized versus 14.2% for VGI. Worst drawdown: AOD -88.1% vs VGI -63.3%.
Should I hold both AOD and VGI?
AOD and VGI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AOD and VGI?
AOD and VGI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 519 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AOD or VGI?
AOD yields 11.72% while VGI yields 11.98%, so VGI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.