ARKQ vs IVV
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ARKQ or IVV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ARKQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window, IVV over 5Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ARKQ | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.9B | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.27% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 39 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +4.74% | +12.70%Best |
| 1Y Return | +27.89%Best | +19.36% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +30.90%Best | +21.16% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.31% | +12.75%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 27.4% | 14.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -59.9% | -33.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,905 | $18,221Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 55.9% | 37.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Ark Invest | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 30, 2014 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 30, 2014 to Sep 8, 2026 (11.9 years).
ARKQ vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.9 years both funds cover.
ARKQ vs IVV Performance
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) is an ETF from Ark Invest and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ARKQ returned +27.89% while IVV returned +19.36%. Year to date, ARKQ is up 4.74% versus a gain of 12.70% for IVV.
Over three years, ARKQ compounded at +30.90% per year against +21.16% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +8.31% and +12.75% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, ARKQ has the edge at +17.30% annualized vs +12.75%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ARKQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.4% compared with 14.9% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.9% for ARKQ and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ARKQ charges 0.75% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARKQ currently yields 0.27% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
52.7% of ARKQ's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 25.3% of IVV's money is in holdings ARKQ also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
17 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in ARKQ and 504 in IVV, against full books of 39 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 476 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for ARKQ (73.9% of the fund), and 15 for ARKQ that do not appear in IVV (38.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ARKQ | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 3.57% | 7.98% | 4.41% |
| TSLATesla Motors Inc | 9.45% | 1.36% | 8.09% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.40% | 4.01% | 0.61% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 5.86% | 1.18% | 4.68% |
| GOOGAlphabet, Inc., Class C | 4.37% | 2.56% | 1.81% |
| TERTeradyne Inc | 6.67% | 0.09% | 6.58% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 4.46% | 0.55% | 3.91% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.71% | 2.98% | 1.27% |
| GOOGL Alphabet Inc. Class A | 0.26% | 3.19% | 2.93% |
| LHXL3Harris Technologies Inc. | 3.09% | 0.08% | 3.01% |
52.7% of ARKQ is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ARKQ or IVV?
ARKQ has an expense ratio of 0.75% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ARKQ or IVV?
Over the past year ARKQ returned +27.89% vs +19.36% for IVV, so ARKQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), ARKQ annualized +17.30% vs +12.75% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ARKQ or IVV?
ARKQ has been the more volatile fund at 27.4% annualized versus 14.9% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ARKQ -59.9% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both ARKQ and IVV?
ARKQ and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ARKQ and IVV?
52.7% of ARKQ's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 25.3% of IVV's is in holdings ARKQ also owns. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in ARKQ and 504 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, ARKQ or IVV?
ARKQ yields 0.27% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ARKQ?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ARKQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window, IVV over 5Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.