ASEA vs IVV
Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ASEA delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ASEA | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $98M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.97% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 42 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +18.92% | +13.43% | |
| 1Y Return | +30.53% | +22.61% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.90% | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.09% | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -49.0% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 16, 2011 | May 15, 2000 |
ASEA vs IVV Performance
Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ASEA returned +30.53% while IVV returned +22.61%. Year to date, ASEA is up 18.92% versus a gain of 13.43% for IVV.
Over three years, ASEA compounded at +16.90% per year against +21.47% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +13.09% and +13.26% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.03% annualized vs +3.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ASEA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.7% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -49.0% for ASEA and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ASEA charges 0.65% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ASEA currently yields 3.97% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
ASEA and IVV share 0 holdings out of 544 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ASEA or IVV?
ASEA has an expense ratio of 0.65% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ASEA or IVV?
Over the past year ASEA returned +30.53% vs +22.61% for IVV, so ASEA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), ASEA annualized +3.61% vs +7.03% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ASEA or IVV?
ASEA has been the more volatile fund at 16.7% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ASEA -49.0% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both ASEA and IVV?
ASEA and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ASEA and IVV?
ASEA and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 544 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ASEA or IVV?
ASEA yields 3.97% while IVV yields 1.09%, so ASEA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.