ASEA vs IVV
Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ASEA or IVV?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ASEA led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ASEA | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $103M | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.68% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 44 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +21.58%Best | +13.39% |
| 1Y Return | +33.29%Best | +20.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.29% | +21.29%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.74% | +12.88%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.7% | 14.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -49.0% | -33.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,213 | $18,327Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 60.4% | 37.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 16, 2011 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 17, 2011 to Sep 4, 2026 (15.5 years).
ASEA vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 15.5 years both funds cover.
ASEA vs IVV Performance
Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ASEA returned +33.29% while IVV returned +20.08%. Year to date, ASEA is up 21.58% versus a gain of 13.39% for IVV.
Over three years, ASEA compounded at +18.29% per year against +21.29% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +12.74% and +12.88% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +12.45% annualized vs +3.74%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ASEA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.7% compared with 14.2% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -49.0% for ASEA and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ASEA charges 0.65% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ASEA currently yields 3.68% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
2.7% of ASEA's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
ASEA and IVV share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in ASEA and 505 in IVV, against full books of 44 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 496 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for ASEA (99.3% of the fund), and 2 for ASEA that do not appear in IVV (5.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ASEA | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| LHLaboratory Corporation of America Holdings | 2.73% | 0.04% | 2.69% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ASEA and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ASEA or IVV?
ASEA has an expense ratio of 0.65% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ASEA or IVV?
Over the past year ASEA returned +33.29% vs +20.08% for IVV, so ASEA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), ASEA annualized +3.74% vs +12.45% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ASEA or IVV?
ASEA has been the more volatile fund at 16.7% annualized versus 14.2% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ASEA -49.0% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both ASEA and IVV?
ASEA and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ASEA and IVV?
2.7% of ASEA's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.0% of IVV's is in holdings ASEA also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in ASEA and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, ASEA or IVV?
ASEA yields 3.68% while IVV yields 1.10%, so ASEA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ASEA?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ASEA led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.