ASEA vs VTI
Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, ASEA or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. ASEA led over 1Y and 5Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ASEA | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $103M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.68% | 1.07% |
| Holdings | 44 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +21.58%Best | +13.59% |
| 1Y Return | +33.29%Best | +20.00% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.29% | +20.95%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.74%Best | +11.81% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.7% | 14.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -49.0% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,213Best | $17,474 |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 16, 2011 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 17, 2011 to Sep 4, 2026 (15.5 years).
ASEA vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 15.5 years both funds cover.
ASEA vs VTI Performance
Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ASEA returned +33.29% while VTI returned +20.00%. Year to date, ASEA is up 21.58% versus a gain of 13.59% for VTI.
Over three years, ASEA compounded at +18.29% per year against +20.95% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +12.74% and +11.81% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +12.10% annualized vs +3.74%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ASEA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.7% compared with 14.6% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -49.0% for ASEA and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ASEA charges 0.65% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ASEA currently yields 3.68% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 2.7% of ASEA's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 92.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
ASEA and VTI share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in ASEA and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 44 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ASEA | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| LHLaboratory Corporation of America Holdings | 2.73% | 0.03% | 2.70% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ASEA and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ASEA or VTI?
ASEA has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ASEA or VTI?
Over the past year ASEA returned +33.29% vs +20.00% for VTI, so ASEA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), ASEA annualized +3.74% vs +12.10% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ASEA or VTI?
ASEA has been the more volatile fund at 16.7% annualized versus 14.6% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ASEA -49.0% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both ASEA and VTI?
ASEA and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ASEA and VTI?
At least 2.7% of ASEA's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in ASEA and 2,787 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, ASEA or VTI?
ASEA yields 3.68% while VTI yields 1.07%, so ASEA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than ASEA?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. ASEA led over 1Y and 5Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.