ASEA vs VTI
Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. ASEA delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ASEA | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $98M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.97% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 42 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +18.92% | +13.87% | |
| 1Y Return | +30.53% | +23.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.90% | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.09% | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -49.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 16, 2011 | May 24, 2001 |
ASEA vs VTI Performance
Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ASEA returned +30.53% while VTI returned +23.31%. Year to date, ASEA is up 18.92% versus a gain of 13.87% for VTI.
Over three years, ASEA compounded at +16.90% per year against +21.17% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +13.09% and +12.23% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.13% annualized vs +3.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ASEA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.7% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -49.0% for ASEA and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ASEA charges 0.65% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ASEA currently yields 3.97% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
ASEA and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2822 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ASEA or VTI?
ASEA has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ASEA or VTI?
Over the past year ASEA returned +30.53% vs +23.31% for VTI, so ASEA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), ASEA annualized +3.61% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ASEA or VTI?
ASEA has been the more volatile fund at 16.7% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ASEA -49.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both ASEA and VTI?
ASEA and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ASEA and VTI?
ASEA and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2822 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ASEA or VTI?
ASEA yields 3.97% while VTI yields 1.07%, so ASEA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.