ASEA vs SPY
Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Quick Verdict
SPY has a lower expense ratio. ASEA delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPY offers more diversification with 503 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ASEA | SPY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $98M | $789.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.97% | 1.01% | |
| Holdings | 42 | 505 | |
| YTD Return | +18.92% | +13.39% | |
| 1Y Return | +30.53% | +22.52% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.90% | +21.36% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.09% | +13.19% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -49.0% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 16, 2011 | Jan 22, 1993 |
ASEA vs SPY Performance
Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year ASEA returned +30.53% while SPY returned +22.52%. Year to date, ASEA is up 18.92% versus a gain of 13.39% for SPY.
Over three years, ASEA compounded at +16.90% per year against +21.36% for SPY; over five years the annualized figures are +13.09% and +13.19% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, SPY has the edge at +8.84% annualized vs +3.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ASEA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.7% compared with 15.3% for SPY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -49.0% for ASEA and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ASEA charges 0.65% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $9 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ASEA currently yields 3.97% against 1.01% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
ASEA and SPY share 0 holdings out of 542 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ASEA or SPY?
ASEA has an expense ratio of 0.65% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ASEA or SPY?
Over the past year ASEA returned +30.53% vs +22.52% for SPY, so ASEA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), ASEA annualized +3.61% vs +8.84% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ASEA or SPY?
ASEA has been the more volatile fund at 16.7% annualized versus 15.3% for SPY. Worst drawdown: ASEA -49.0% vs SPY -56.5%.
Should I hold both ASEA and SPY?
ASEA and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ASEA and SPY?
ASEA and SPY share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 542 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ASEA or SPY?
ASEA yields 3.97% while SPY yields 1.01%, so ASEA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.