ASEA vs QQQ
Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, ASEA or QQQ?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. ASEA led over 1Y, QQQ over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ASEA | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $103M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.68% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 44 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +17.81% | +21.18%Best |
| 1Y Return | +27.95%Best | +24.36% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.81% | +27.99%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.26% | +15.39%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.7%Best | 17.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -49.0% | -35.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,829 | $20,457Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 61.0% | 46.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Feb 16, 2011 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 17, 2011 to Sep 23, 2026 (15.6 years).
ASEA vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ASEA vs QQQ Performance
Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year ASEA returned +27.95% while QQQ returned +24.36%. Year to date, ASEA is up 17.81% versus a gain of 21.18% for QQQ.
Over three years, ASEA compounded at +17.81% per year against +27.99% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +12.26% and +15.39% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +17.88% annualized vs +3.52%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.4% compared with 16.7% for ASEA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -49.0% for ASEA and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ASEA charges 0.65% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $18 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ASEA currently yields 3.68% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 40 holdings in ASEA and 102 in QQQ, totalling 99.9% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in ASEA and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 44 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 96 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for ASEA (97.5% of the fund), and 3 for ASEA that do not appear in QQQ (2.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ASEA and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ASEA or QQQ?
ASEA has an expense ratio of 0.65% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ASEA or QQQ?
Over the past year ASEA returned +27.95% vs +24.36% for QQQ, so ASEA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), ASEA annualized +3.52% vs +17.88% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ASEA or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 17.4% annualized versus 16.7% for ASEA. Worst drawdown: ASEA -49.0% vs QQQ -35.1%.
Should I hold both ASEA and QQQ?
ASEA and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ASEA or QQQ?
ASEA yields 3.68% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so ASEA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than ASEA?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. ASEA led over 1Y, QQQ over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.