ASEA vs VYM
Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. ASEA delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ASEA | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $98M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.97% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 42 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +18.92% | +16.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +30.53% | +26.05% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.90% | +18.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.09% | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.7% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -49.0% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 16, 2011 | Nov 10, 2006 |
ASEA vs VYM Performance
Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ASEA returned +30.53% while VYM returned +26.05%. Year to date, ASEA is up 18.92% versus a gain of 16.16% for VYM.
Over three years, ASEA compounded at +16.90% per year against +18.43% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +13.09% and +12.21% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.09% annualized vs +3.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ASEA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.7% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -49.0% for ASEA and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ASEA charges 0.65% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $4 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ASEA currently yields 3.97% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
ASEA and VYM share 0 holdings out of 597 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ASEA or VYM?
ASEA has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $61 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ASEA or VYM?
Over the past year ASEA returned +30.53% vs +26.05% for VYM, so ASEA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), ASEA annualized +3.61% vs +7.09% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ASEA or VYM?
ASEA has been the more volatile fund at 16.7% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: ASEA -49.0% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both ASEA and VYM?
ASEA and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ASEA and VYM?
ASEA and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 597 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ASEA or VYM?
ASEA yields 3.97% while VYM yields 2.86%, so ASEA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.