ASGI vs QQQ
Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. ASGI delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ASGI | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.78% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $695M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.88% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 73 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +19.99% | +17.07% | |
| 1Y Return | +31.05% | +26.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.20% | +26.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.30% | +15.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.1% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.7% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 28, 2020 | Mar 10, 1999 |
ASGI vs QQQ Performance
Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund (ASGI) is a ETF from Aberdeen and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year ASGI returned +31.05% while QQQ returned +26.39%. Year to date, ASGI is up 19.99% versus a gain of 17.07% for QQQ.
Over three years, ASGI compounded at +27.20% per year against +26.08% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +14.30% and +15.18% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, ASGI has the edge at +14.21% annualized vs +13.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 19.1% for ASGI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.7% for ASGI and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ASGI charges 1.78% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $178 vs $18 annually, a gap of $160 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ASGI currently yields 11.88% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
ASGI and QQQ share 3 holdings out of 155 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ASGI or QQQ?
ASGI has an expense ratio of 1.78% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $160 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ASGI or QQQ?
Over the past year ASGI returned +31.05% vs +26.39% for QQQ, so ASGI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), ASGI annualized +14.21% vs +13.05% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ASGI or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 19.1% for ASGI. Worst drawdown: ASGI -23.7% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both ASGI and QQQ?
ASGI and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ASGI and QQQ?
ASGI and QQQ share 3 common holdings with a 0.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 155 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ASGI or QQQ?
ASGI yields 11.88% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so ASGI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.