ASGI vs VTI
Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, ASGI or VTI?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ASGI | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.78% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $695M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 12.09% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 55 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | -6.88% | +12.51%Best |
| 1Y Return | +2.36% | +15.23%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.69% | +22.50%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.60% | +12.31%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.8% | 15.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -23.7%Best | -25.4% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,814 | $17,869Best |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 28, 2020 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 29, 2020 to Oct 1, 2026 (6.2 years).
ASGI vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.2 years both funds cover.
ASGI vs VTI Performance
Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund (ASGI) is an ETF from Aberdeen and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ASGI returned +2.36% while VTI returned +15.23%. Year to date, ASGI is down 6.88% versus a gain of 12.51% for VTI.
Over three years, ASGI compounded at +19.69% per year against +22.50% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +9.60% and +12.31% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +15.70% annualized vs +9.34%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ASGI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.8% compared with 15.6% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.7% for ASGI and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ASGI charges 1.78% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $178 vs $3 annually, a gap of $175 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ASGI currently yields 12.09% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 1.7% of VTI's money is in holdings ASGI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for ASGI, our book for it covers 77.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
VTI and ASGI share little of their money.
21 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in ASGI and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 55 and 3,524.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ASGI | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NEENextera Energy Inc | 2.36% | 0.25% | 2.11% |
| UNPUnion Pacific Corp | 2.32% | 0.24% | 2.08% |
| AMTAmerican Tower Corporation | 2.17% | 0.11% | 2.06% |
| WMBWilliams Cos. Inc. | 2.13% | 0.12% | 2.01% |
| LNGCheniere Energy Inc. | 2.13% | 0.08% | 2.05% |
| OKEOneok Inc. | 2.02% | 0.08% | 1.94% |
| PPLPpl Corp (Utilities) | 2.01% | 0.03% | 1.98% |
| KMIKinder Morgan Inc./de | 1.81% | 0.08% | 1.73% |
| DUKDuke Energy Corp | 1.59% | 0.14% | 1.45% |
| FEFirstenergy Corp | 1.64% | 0.04% | 1.60% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ASGI and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ASGI or VTI?
ASGI has an expense ratio of 1.78% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $175 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ASGI or VTI?
Over the past year ASGI returned +2.36% vs +15.23% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), ASGI annualized +9.34% vs +15.70% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ASGI or VTI?
ASGI has been the more volatile fund at 19.8% annualized versus 15.6% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ASGI -23.7% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both ASGI and VTI?
ASGI and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ASGI and VTI?
At least 1.7% of VTI's money is in holdings ASGI also owns. Our book for ASGI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 21 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in ASGI and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, ASGI or VTI?
ASGI yields 12.09% while VTI yields 1.03%, so ASGI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than ASGI?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.