ASGI vs VTI
Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. ASGI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ASGI | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.78% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $695M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.88% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 73 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +19.85% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +31.19% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.78% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.60% | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.1% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 28, 2020 | May 24, 2001 |
ASGI vs VTI Performance
Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund (ASGI) is a ETF from Aberdeen and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ASGI returned +31.19% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, ASGI is up 19.85% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Over three years, ASGI compounded at +26.78% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +13.60% and +12.34% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, ASGI has the edge at +14.22% annualized vs +8.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ASGI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.1% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.7% for ASGI and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ASGI charges 1.78% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $178 vs $3 annually, a gap of $175 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ASGI currently yields 11.88% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
ASGI and VTI share 20 holdings out of 2823 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ASGI or VTI?
ASGI has an expense ratio of 1.78% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $175 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ASGI or VTI?
Over the past year ASGI returned +31.19% vs +22.43% for VTI, so ASGI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), ASGI annualized +14.22% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ASGI or VTI?
ASGI has been the more volatile fund at 19.1% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ASGI -23.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both ASGI and VTI?
ASGI and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ASGI and VTI?
ASGI and VTI share 20 common holdings with a 1.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2823 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ASGI or VTI?
ASGI yields 11.88% while VTI yields 1.07%, so ASGI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.