ASGI vs IVV
Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ASGI or IVV?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ASGI led over 1Y and 3Y, IVV over 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ASGI | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.78% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $695M | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 11.88% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 73 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +7.30% | +13.39%Best |
| 1Y Return | +22.73%Best | +20.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.19%Best | +21.29% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.55% | +12.88%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.1% | 15.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -23.7%Best | -24.5% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,272 | $18,327Best |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 28, 2020 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 29, 2020 to Sep 4, 2026 (6.1 years).
ASGI vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.1 years both funds cover.
ASGI vs IVV Performance
Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund (ASGI) is an ETF from Aberdeen and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ASGI returned +22.73% while IVV returned +20.08%. Year to date, ASGI is up 7.30% versus a gain of 13.39% for IVV.
Over three years, ASGI compounded at +22.19% per year against +21.29% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +11.55% and +12.88% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +16.66% annualized vs +12.03%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ASGI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.1% compared with 15.5% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.7% for ASGI and -24.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ASGI charges 1.78% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $178 vs $3 annually, a gap of $175 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ASGI currently yields 11.88% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
At least 1.7% of IVV's money is in holdings ASGI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for ASGI, our book for it covers 77.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
IVV and ASGI share little of their money.
16 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in ASGI and 504 in IVV, against full books of 73 and 508.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ASGI | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NEENextera Energy Inc | 2.36% | 0.27% | 2.09% |
| UNPUnion Pacific Corp | 2.32% | 0.26% | 2.06% |
| AMTAmerican Tower Corp | 2.17% | 0.12% | 2.05% |
| WMBWilliams Cos Inc/the | 2.13% | 0.13% | 2.00% |
| OKEOneok Inc. | 2.02% | 0.08% | 1.94% |
| PPLPpl Corp. | 2.01% | 0.04% | 1.97% |
| KMIKinder Morgan Inc./de | 1.81% | 0.09% | 1.72% |
| DUKDuke Energy Corp. | 1.59% | 0.14% | 1.45% |
| FEFirstenergy Corp. | 1.64% | 0.04% | 1.60% |
| CMSCms Energy Corp. | 1.55% | 0.03% | 1.52% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ASGI and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ASGI or IVV?
ASGI has an expense ratio of 1.78% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $175 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ASGI or IVV?
Over the past year ASGI returned +22.73% vs +20.08% for IVV, so ASGI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), ASGI annualized +12.03% vs +16.66% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ASGI or IVV?
ASGI has been the more volatile fund at 19.1% annualized versus 15.5% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ASGI -23.7% vs IVV -24.5%.
Should I hold both ASGI and IVV?
ASGI and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ASGI and IVV?
At least 1.7% of IVV's money is in holdings ASGI also owns. Our book for ASGI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 16 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in ASGI and 504 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, ASGI or IVV?
ASGI yields 11.88% while IVV yields 1.10%, so ASGI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ASGI?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ASGI led over 1Y and 3Y, IVV over 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.