ASGI vs IVV
Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ASGI delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ASGI | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.78% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $695M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.88% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 73 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +19.85% | +14.29% | |
| 1Y Return | +31.19% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.78% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.60% | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.7% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 28, 2020 | May 15, 2000 |
ASGI vs IVV Performance
Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund (ASGI) is a ETF from Aberdeen and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ASGI returned +31.19% while IVV returned +21.79%. Year to date, ASGI is up 19.85% versus a gain of 14.29% for IVV.
Over three years, ASGI compounded at +26.78% per year against +22.19% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +13.60% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, ASGI has the edge at +14.22% annualized vs +7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ASGI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.7% for ASGI and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ASGI charges 1.78% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $178 vs $3 annually, a gap of $175 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ASGI currently yields 11.88% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
ASGI and IVV share 16 holdings out of 545 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ASGI or IVV?
ASGI has an expense ratio of 1.78% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $175 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ASGI or IVV?
Over the past year ASGI returned +31.19% vs +21.79% for IVV, so ASGI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), ASGI annualized +14.22% vs +7.06% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ASGI or IVV?
ASGI has been the more volatile fund at 19.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ASGI -23.7% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both ASGI and IVV?
ASGI and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ASGI and IVV?
ASGI and IVV share 16 common holdings with a 1.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 545 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ASGI or IVV?
ASGI yields 11.88% while IVV yields 1.10%, so ASGI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.