ASGI vs VXUS
Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. ASGI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ASGI | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.78% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $695M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.88% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 73 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +19.85% | +15.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +31.19% | +26.86% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.78% | +20.34% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.60% | +9.38% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.7% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 28, 2020 | Jan 26, 2011 |
ASGI vs VXUS Performance
Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund (ASGI) is a ETF from Aberdeen and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ASGI returned +31.19% while VXUS returned +26.86%. Year to date, ASGI is up 19.85% versus a gain of 15.22% for VXUS.
Over three years, ASGI compounded at +26.78% per year against +20.34% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +13.60% and +9.38% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, ASGI has the edge at +14.22% annualized vs +4.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ASGI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.1% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.7% for ASGI and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ASGI charges 1.78% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $178 vs $5 annually, a gap of $173 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ASGI currently yields 11.88% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
ASGI and VXUS share 22 holdings out of 7903 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ASGI or VXUS?
ASGI has an expense ratio of 1.78% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $173 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ASGI or VXUS?
Over the past year ASGI returned +31.19% vs +26.86% for VXUS, so ASGI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), ASGI annualized +14.22% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ASGI or VXUS?
ASGI has been the more volatile fund at 19.1% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: ASGI -23.7% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both ASGI and VXUS?
ASGI and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ASGI and VXUS?
ASGI and VXUS share 22 common holdings with a 1.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7903 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ASGI or VXUS?
ASGI yields 11.88% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so ASGI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.