ASGI vs VYM
Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. ASGI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ASGI | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.78% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $695M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.88% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 73 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +19.89% | +15.75% | |
| 1Y Return | +30.58% | +23.85% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.20% | +19.14% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.83% | +12.45% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.1% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.7% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 28, 2020 | Nov 10, 2006 |
ASGI vs VYM Performance
Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund (ASGI) is a ETF from Aberdeen and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ASGI returned +30.58% while VYM returned +23.85%. Year to date, ASGI is up 19.89% versus a gain of 15.75% for VYM.
Over three years, ASGI compounded at +27.20% per year against +19.14% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +13.83% and +12.45% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, ASGI has the edge at +14.20% annualized vs +7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ASGI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.1% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.7% for ASGI and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ASGI charges 1.78% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $178 vs $4 annually, a gap of $174 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ASGI currently yields 11.88% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
ASGI and VYM share 17 holdings out of 642 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ASGI or VYM?
ASGI has an expense ratio of 1.78% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $174 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ASGI or VYM?
Over the past year ASGI returned +30.58% vs +23.85% for VYM, so ASGI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), ASGI annualized +14.20% vs +7.06% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ASGI or VYM?
ASGI has been the more volatile fund at 19.1% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: ASGI -23.7% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both ASGI and VYM?
ASGI and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ASGI and VYM?
ASGI and VYM share 17 common holdings with a 4.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 642 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ASGI or VYM?
ASGI yields 11.88% while VYM yields 2.24%, so ASGI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.