AWP vs SCHD
Abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 104 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AWP | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.27% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $378M | $108.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.00% | 3.13% | |
| Holdings | 54 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +9.85% | +28.63% | |
| 1Y Return | +12.36% | +32.53% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.77% | +16.97% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.10% | +10.47% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.6% | 13.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -89.3% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 26, 2007 | Oct 20, 2011 |
AWP vs SCHD Performance
Abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund (AWP) is a ETF from Aberdeen and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year AWP returned +12.36% while SCHD returned +32.53%. Year to date, AWP is up 9.85% versus a gain of 28.63% for SCHD.
Over three years, AWP compounded at +12.77% per year against +16.97% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +1.10% and +10.47% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.63% annualized vs -5.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AWP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.6% compared with 13.7% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -89.3% for AWP and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AWP charges 1.27% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $127 vs $6 annually, a gap of $121 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AWP currently yields 8.00% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
AWP and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 154 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AWP or SCHD?
AWP has an expense ratio of 1.27% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $121 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AWP or SCHD?
Over the past year AWP returned +12.36% vs +32.53% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), AWP annualized -5.16% vs +11.63% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AWP or SCHD?
AWP has been the more volatile fund at 26.6% annualized versus 13.7% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: AWP -89.3% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both AWP and SCHD?
AWP and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AWP and SCHD?
AWP and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 154 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AWP or SCHD?
AWP yields 8.00% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so AWP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.