AWP vs VOO
Abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AWP | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.27% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $378M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.00% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 54 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +10.32% | +12.25% | |
| 1Y Return | +11.71% | +20.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.92% | +21.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.18% | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.6% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -89.3% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 26, 2007 | Sep 7, 2010 |
AWP vs VOO Performance
Abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund (AWP) is a ETF from Aberdeen and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AWP returned +11.71% while VOO returned +20.92%. Year to date, AWP is up 10.32% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Over three years, AWP compounded at +12.92% per year against +21.79% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +1.18% and +13.05% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.45% annualized vs -5.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AWP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.6% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -89.3% for AWP and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AWP charges 1.27% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $127 vs $3 annually, a gap of $124 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AWP currently yields 8.00% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
AWP and VOO share 13 holdings out of 546 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AWP or VOO?
AWP has an expense ratio of 1.27% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $124 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AWP or VOO?
Over the past year AWP returned +11.71% vs +20.92% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), AWP annualized -5.14% vs +13.45% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AWP or VOO?
AWP has been the more volatile fund at 26.6% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: AWP -89.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both AWP and VOO?
AWP and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AWP and VOO?
AWP and VOO share 13 common holdings with a 1.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 546 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AWP or VOO?
AWP yields 8.00% while VOO yields 1.08%, so AWP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.