AWP vs VOO
Abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, AWP or VOO?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AWP | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.27% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $378M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 8.00% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 54 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +5.90% | +12.23%Best |
| 1Y Return | +5.37% | +18.60%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.86% | +20.98%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.19% | +12.76%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.1% | 14.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -64.1% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $9,905 | $18,230Best |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 26, 2007 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 9, 2026 (16 years).
AWP vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
AWP vs VOO Performance
Abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund (AWP) is an ETF from Aberdeen and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AWP returned +5.37% while VOO returned +18.60%. Year to date, AWP is up 5.90% versus a gain of 12.23% for VOO.
Over three years, AWP compounded at +12.86% per year against +20.98% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -0.19% and +12.76% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.40% annualized vs +0.58%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AWP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.1% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -64.1% for AWP and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AWP charges 1.27% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $127 vs $3 annually, a gap of $124 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AWP currently yields 8.00% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
At least 1.2% of VOO's money is in holdings AWP also owns.
Only one direction is shown: for AWP, our book for it lists positions totalling 106.9% of the fund, which is what a leveraged book looks like and is not a denominator we can divide by.
VOO and AWP share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 150 days apart, AWP as of Jan 31, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
13 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in AWP and 505 in VOO, against full books of 54 and 509.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AWP | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| WELLWelltower Inc | 11.51% | 0.25% | 11.26% |
| PLDPrologis Inc | 6.16% | 0.20% | 5.96% |
| SPGSimon Property Group Inc | 4.82% | 0.11% | 4.71% |
| ORealty Income Corp. | 4.79% | 0.09% | 4.70% |
| VTRVentas, Inc. | 4.62% | 0.07% | 4.55% |
| DLRDigital Realty Trust Inc. | 3.80% | 0.09% | 3.71% |
| EQIXEquinix, Inc. | 3.71% | 0.16% | 3.55% |
| PSAPublic Storage | 2.94% | 0.08% | 2.86% |
| ESSEssex Property Trust Inc. | 2.53% | 0.03% | 2.50% |
| REGRegency Centers Corp. | 2.36% | 0.02% | 2.34% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AWP and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AWP or VOO?
AWP has an expense ratio of 1.27% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $124 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AWP or VOO?
Over the past year AWP returned +5.37% vs +18.60% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), AWP annualized +0.58% vs +13.40% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AWP or VOO?
AWP has been the more volatile fund at 22.1% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: AWP -64.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both AWP and VOO?
AWP and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AWP and VOO?
At least 1.2% of VOO's money is in holdings AWP also owns. Our book for AWP is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in AWP and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, AWP or VOO?
AWP yields 8.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so AWP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than AWP?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.