AWP vs VXUS
Abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AWP | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.27% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $378M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.53% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 54 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +10.04% | +15.24% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.42% | +26.32% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.35% | +19.85% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.70% | +9.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -89.3% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 26, 2007 | Jan 26, 2011 |
AWP vs VXUS Performance
Abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund (AWP) is a ETF from Aberdeen and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AWP returned +13.42% while VXUS returned +26.32%. Year to date, AWP is up 10.04% versus a gain of 15.24% for VXUS.
Over three years, AWP compounded at +12.35% per year against +19.85% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +0.70% and +9.23% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.89% annualized vs -5.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AWP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.6% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -89.3% for AWP and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AWP charges 1.27% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $127 vs $5 annually, a gap of $122 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AWP currently yields 7.53% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
AWP and VXUS share 24 holdings out of 7891 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AWP or VXUS?
AWP has an expense ratio of 1.27% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $122 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AWP or VXUS?
Over the past year AWP returned +13.42% vs +26.32% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), AWP annualized -5.15% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AWP or VXUS?
AWP has been the more volatile fund at 26.6% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: AWP -89.3% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both AWP and VXUS?
AWP and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AWP and VXUS?
AWP and VXUS share 24 common holdings with a 0.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7891 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AWP or VXUS?
AWP yields 7.53% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so AWP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.