AWP vs VTI
Abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AWP | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.27% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $378M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 54 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +9.95% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +11.33% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.89% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.09% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -89.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 26, 2007 | May 24, 2001 |
AWP vs VTI Performance
Abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund (AWP) is a ETF from Aberdeen and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AWP returned +11.33% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, AWP is up 9.95% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, AWP compounded at +12.89% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +1.09% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.09% annualized vs -5.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AWP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -89.3% for AWP and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AWP charges 1.27% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $127 vs $3 annually, a gap of $124 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AWP currently yields 8.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
AWP and VTI share 19 holdings out of 2822 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AWP or VTI?
AWP has an expense ratio of 1.27% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $124 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AWP or VTI?
Over the past year AWP returned +11.33% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), AWP annualized -5.15% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AWP or VTI?
AWP has been the more volatile fund at 26.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: AWP -89.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both AWP and VTI?
AWP and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AWP and VTI?
AWP and VTI share 19 common holdings with a 1.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2822 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AWP or VTI?
AWP yields 8.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so AWP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.