AWP vs IVV
Abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AWP | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.27% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $378M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.00% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 54 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +10.32% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | +11.71% | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.92% | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.18% | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -89.3% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 26, 2007 | May 15, 2000 |
AWP vs IVV Performance
Abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund (AWP) is a ETF from Aberdeen and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year AWP returned +11.71% while IVV returned +20.94%. Year to date, AWP is up 10.32% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Over three years, AWP compounded at +12.92% per year against +21.81% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +1.18% and +13.05% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.98% annualized vs -5.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AWP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.6% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -89.3% for AWP and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AWP charges 1.27% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $127 vs $3 annually, a gap of $124 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AWP currently yields 8.00% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
AWP and IVV share 13 holdings out of 546 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AWP or IVV?
AWP has an expense ratio of 1.27% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $124 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AWP or IVV?
Over the past year AWP returned +11.71% vs +20.94% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), AWP annualized -5.14% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AWP or IVV?
AWP has been the more volatile fund at 26.6% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: AWP -89.3% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both AWP and IVV?
AWP and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AWP and IVV?
AWP and IVV share 13 common holdings with a 1.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 546 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AWP or IVV?
AWP yields 8.00% while IVV yields 1.10%, so AWP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.