AWP vs IVV
Abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, AWP or IVV?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AWP | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.27% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $378M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 8.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 54 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +4.68% | +11.57%Best |
| 1Y Return | +4.67% | +17.57%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.41% | +20.71%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.15% | +12.80%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.5% | 15.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -89.3% | -56.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $9,925 | $18,262Best |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 26, 2007 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 26, 2007 to Sep 10, 2026 (19.4 years).
AWP vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.4 years both funds cover.
AWP vs IVV Performance
Abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund (AWP) is an ETF from Aberdeen and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year AWP returned +4.67% while IVV returned +17.57%. Year to date, AWP is up 4.68% versus a gain of 11.57% for IVV.
Over three years, AWP compounded at +12.41% per year against +20.71% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -0.15% and +12.80% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +9.18% annualized vs -5.38%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AWP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.5% compared with 15.5% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -89.3% for AWP and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AWP charges 1.27% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $127 vs $3 annually, a gap of $124 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AWP currently yields 8.00% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
At least 1.2% of IVV's money is in holdings AWP also owns.
Only one direction is shown: for AWP, our book for it lists positions totalling 106.9% of the fund, which is what a leveraged book looks like and is not a denominator we can divide by.
IVV and AWP share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 186 days apart, AWP as of Jan 31, 2026 and IVV as of Aug 5, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
13 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in AWP and 505 in IVV, against full books of 54 and 508.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AWP | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| WELLWelltower Inc | 11.51% | 0.25% | 11.26% |
| PLDPrologis Inc | 6.16% | 0.20% | 5.96% |
| SPGSimon Property Group Inc | 4.82% | 0.11% | 4.71% |
| ORealty Income Corp. | 4.79% | 0.09% | 4.70% |
| VTRVentas, Inc. | 4.62% | 0.07% | 4.55% |
| DLRDigital Realty Trust Inc. | 3.80% | 0.10% | 3.70% |
| EQIXEquinix, Inc. | 3.71% | 0.16% | 3.55% |
| PSAPublic Storage | 2.94% | 0.08% | 2.86% |
| ESSEssex Property Trust Inc. | 2.53% | 0.03% | 2.50% |
| REGRegency Centers Corp. | 2.36% | 0.02% | 2.34% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AWP and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AWP or IVV?
AWP has an expense ratio of 1.27% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $124 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AWP or IVV?
Over the past year AWP returned +4.67% vs +17.57% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), AWP annualized -5.38% vs +9.18% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AWP or IVV?
AWP has been the more volatile fund at 26.5% annualized versus 15.5% for IVV. Worst drawdown: AWP -89.3% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both AWP and IVV?
AWP and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AWP and IVV?
At least 1.2% of IVV's money is in holdings AWP also owns. Our book for AWP is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in AWP and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, AWP or IVV?
AWP yields 8.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so AWP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than AWP?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.