AWP vs SPY
Abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Quick Verdict
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPY offers more diversification with 503 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AWP | SPY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.27% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $378M | $789.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.53% | 1.01% | |
| Holdings | 54 | 505 | |
| YTD Return | +10.04% | +14.47% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.42% | +21.96% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.35% | +21.70% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.70% | +13.30% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -89.3% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 26, 2007 | Jan 22, 1993 |
AWP vs SPY Performance
Abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund (AWP) is a ETF from Aberdeen and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year AWP returned +13.42% while SPY returned +21.96%. Year to date, AWP is up 10.04% versus a gain of 14.47% for SPY.
Over three years, AWP compounded at +12.35% per year against +21.70% for SPY; over five years the annualized figures are +0.70% and +13.30% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, SPY has the edge at +8.87% annualized vs -5.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AWP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.6% compared with 15.3% for SPY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -89.3% for AWP and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AWP charges 1.27% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $127 vs $9 annually, a gap of $118 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AWP currently yields 7.53% against 1.01% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
AWP and SPY share 13 holdings out of 544 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AWP or SPY?
AWP has an expense ratio of 1.27% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $118 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AWP or SPY?
Over the past year AWP returned +13.42% vs +21.96% for SPY, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), AWP annualized -5.15% vs +8.87% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AWP or SPY?
AWP has been the more volatile fund at 26.6% annualized versus 15.3% for SPY. Worst drawdown: AWP -89.3% vs SPY -56.5%.
Should I hold both AWP and SPY?
AWP and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AWP and SPY?
AWP and SPY share 13 common holdings with a 1.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 544 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AWP or SPY?
AWP yields 7.53% while SPY yields 1.01%, so AWP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.