BASV vs QUVU
Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF vs Hartford Quality Value ETF
Which is better, BASV or QUVU?
QUVU has been ahead.
QUVU has a lower expense ratio. QUVU led over 1Y. QUVU is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BASV | QUVU |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.71% | 0.45%Best |
| AUM | $413M | $174M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.38% | 1.87% |
| Holdings | 42 | 72 |
| Top 10 Weight | 34.7% | 25.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Brown Advisory | Hartford Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jun 13, 2025 | Oct 13, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
The two price series end 169 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. BASV has data through Oct 15, 2026 and QUVU through Apr 29, 2026.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BASV charges 0.71% per year while QUVU charges 0.45%. On a $10,000 position that is $71 vs $45 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BASV currently yields 0.38% against 1.87% for QUVU.
Holdings Overlap
29.2% of BASV's money is in holdings QUVU also owns. 19.1% of QUVU's money is in holdings BASV also owns.
BASV and QUVU share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 274 days apart, BASV as of Oct 1, 2026 and QUVU as of Dec 31, 2025, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
12 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in BASV and 70 in QUVU, against full books of 42 and 72.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 54 positions for QUVU that do not appear in our book for BASV (75.9% of the fund), and 25 for BASV that do not appear in QUVU (56.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BASV | Weight in QUVU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.27% | 1.25% | 3.02% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 2.90% | 2.55% | 0.35% |
| UL:LNUnilever PLC | 2.83% | 2.06% | 0.77% |
| DELLDell Technologies Inc | 3.48% | 1.40% | 2.08% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.68% | 1.16% | 2.52% |
| AIGAmerican International Gr | 2.77% | 1.57% | 1.20% |
| NXPINxp Semiconductors Nv Sedol B505Pn7 | 2.10% | 1.82% | 0.28% |
| SNXSynnex Corp | 1.88% | 1.50% | 0.38% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.10% | 1.97% | 0.87% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 1.35% | 1.63% | 0.28% |
29.2% of BASV is already inside QUVU.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BASV or QUVU?
BASV has an expense ratio of 0.71% while QUVU charges 0.45%. QUVU is the cheaper option, by $26 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between BASV and QUVU?
29.2% of BASV's money is in holdings QUVU also owns. 19.1% of QUVU's is in holdings BASV also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in BASV and 70 in QUVU.
Which pays a higher dividend, BASV or QUVU?
BASV yields 0.38% while QUVU yields 1.87%, so QUVU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QUVU better than BASV?
QUVU has a lower expense ratio. QUVU led over 1Y. QUVU is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.