BBEM vs FFLV
BBEM vs FFLV
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF
Quick Verdict
BBEM has a lower expense ratio. BBEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. BBEM offers more diversification with 889 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBEM | FFLV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.38% | |
| AUM | $748M | $16M | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.52% | 1.41% | |
| Holdings | 1,132 | 119 | |
| YTD Return | +15.82% | +17.97% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.69% | +32.15% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.42% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 12.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.4% | -16.7% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Fidelity Investments (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 10, 2023 | Feb 9, 2024 |
BBEM vs FFLV Performance
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US). Over the past year BBEM returned +32.69% while FFLV returned +32.15%. Year to date, BBEM is up 15.82% versus a gain of 17.97% for FFLV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BBEM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.3% for FFLV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.4% for BBEM and -16.7% for FFLV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.38. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBEM charges 0.15% per year while FFLV charges 0.38%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $38 annually, a gap of $23 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBEM currently yields 2.52% against 1.41% for FFLV.
Holdings Overlap
BBEM and FFLV share 3 holdings out of 991 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBEM or FFLV?
BBEM has an expense ratio of 0.15% while FFLV charges 0.38%. BBEM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $23 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BBEM or FFLV?
Over the past year BBEM returned +32.69% vs +32.15% for FFLV, so BBEM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BBEM annualized +19.55% vs +17.62% for FFLV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BBEM or FFLV?
BBEM has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.3% for FFLV. Worst drawdown: BBEM -17.4% vs FFLV -16.7%.
Should I hold both BBEM and FFLV?
BBEM and FFLV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.38, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BBEM and FFLV?
BBEM and FFLV share 3 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 991 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBEM or FFLV?
BBEM yields 2.52% while FFLV yields 1.41%, so BBEM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.