FFLV vs VXUS
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. FFLV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFLV | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $16M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.36% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 109 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +17.89% | +15.23% | |
| 1Y Return | +29.13% | +26.78% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.86% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.66% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.7% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 9, 2024 | Jan 26, 2011 |
FFLV vs VXUS Performance
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FFLV returned +29.13% while VXUS returned +26.78%. Year to date, FFLV is up 17.89% versus a gain of 15.23% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.3% for FFLV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.7% for FFLV and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFLV charges 0.38% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $5 annually, a gap of $33 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFLV currently yields 1.36% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
FFLV and VXUS share 6 holdings out of 7975 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFLV or VXUS?
FFLV has an expense ratio of 0.38% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $33 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FFLV or VXUS?
Over the past year FFLV returned +29.13% vs +26.78% for VXUS, so FFLV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), FFLV annualized +17.29% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FFLV or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.3% for FFLV. Worst drawdown: FFLV -16.7% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both FFLV and VXUS?
FFLV and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FFLV and VXUS?
FFLV and VXUS share 6 common holdings with a 1.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7975 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFLV or VXUS?
FFLV yields 1.36% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.