BBH vs VXUS
VanEck Biotech ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. BBH delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBH | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $394M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.47% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 26 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +15.46% | +15.24% | |
| 1Y Return | +33.95% | +26.32% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.28% | +19.85% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.19% | +9.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 31.0% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -72.7% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 20, 2011 | Jan 26, 2011 |
BBH vs VXUS Performance
VanEck Biotech ETF (BBH) is a ETF from VanEck and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BBH returned +33.95% while VXUS returned +26.32%. Year to date, BBH is up 15.46% versus a gain of 15.24% for VXUS.
Over three years, BBH compounded at +11.28% per year against +19.85% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +1.19% and +9.23% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, BBH has the edge at +14.31% annualized vs +4.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BBH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.0% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -72.7% for BBH and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBH charges 0.35% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $5 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBH currently yields 0.47% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
BBH and VXUS share 2 holdings out of 7883 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBH or VXUS?
BBH has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $30 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BBH or VXUS?
Over the past year BBH returned +33.95% vs +26.32% for VXUS, so BBH leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), BBH annualized +14.31% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BBH or VXUS?
BBH has been the more volatile fund at 31.0% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: BBH -72.7% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both BBH and VXUS?
BBH and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BBH and VXUS?
BBH and VXUS share 2 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7883 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBH or VXUS?
BBH yields 0.47% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.