BBH vs VOO
VanEck Biotech ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. BBH delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBH | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $394M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.47% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 26 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +15.46% | +14.48% | |
| 1Y Return | +33.95% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.28% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.19% | +13.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 31.0% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -72.7% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 20, 2011 | Sep 7, 2010 |
BBH vs VOO Performance
VanEck Biotech ETF (BBH) is a ETF from VanEck and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BBH returned +33.95% while VOO returned +22.02%. Year to date, BBH is up 15.46% versus a gain of 14.48% for VOO.
Over three years, BBH compounded at +11.28% per year against +21.80% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +1.19% and +13.36% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, BBH has the edge at +14.31% annualized vs +13.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BBH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.0% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -72.7% for BBH and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBH charges 0.35% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBH currently yields 0.47% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
BBH and VOO share 10 holdings out of 519 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBH or VOO?
BBH has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BBH or VOO?
Over the past year BBH returned +33.95% vs +22.02% for VOO, so BBH leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), BBH annualized +14.31% vs +13.61% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BBH or VOO?
BBH has been the more volatile fund at 31.0% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: BBH -72.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both BBH and VOO?
BBH and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BBH and VOO?
BBH and VOO share 10 common holdings with a 1.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 519 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBH or VOO?
BBH yields 0.47% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.