BBH vs VTI
VanEck Biotech ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, BBH or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. BBH led over 1Y and the full window, VTI over 3Y and 5Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBH | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $406M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.46% | 1.07% |
| Holdings | 25 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +28.12%Best | +13.95% |
| 1Y Return | +47.80%Best | +21.44% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.20% | +21.10%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.56% | +11.77%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 27.7% | 15.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -53.9%Best | -56.6% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,347 | $17,443Best |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 20, 2011 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 31, 2001 to Sep 3, 2026 (25.3 years).
BBH vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 25.3 years both funds cover.
BBH vs VTI Performance
VanEck Biotech ETF (BBH) is an ETF from VanEck and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BBH returned +47.80% while VTI returned +21.44%. Year to date, BBH is up 28.12% versus a gain of 13.95% for VTI.
Over three years, BBH compounded at +15.20% per year against +21.10% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +2.56% and +11.77% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, BBH has the edge at +14.63% annualized vs +8.11%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BBH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.7% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.9% for BBH and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBH charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBH currently yields 0.46% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 84.8% of BBH's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 92.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of BBH is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
17 positions in common, counted across the 24 positions we hold weights for in BBH and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 25 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BBH | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 16.58% | 0.27% | 16.31% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 12.87% | 0.22% | 12.65% |
| VRTXNvaesrtex Pharmaceuticals Inc | 8.58% | 0.17% | 8.41% |
| REGNRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 7.39% | 0.09% | 7.30% |
| RVMDRevolution Medicines Inc | 5.36% | 0.05% | 5.31% |
| IQVIqvia Holdings Inc | 5.08% | 0.04% | 5.04% |
| NTRANatera Inc | 4.80% | 0.05% | 4.75% |
| ILMNIllumina, Inc. | 3.48% | 0.03% | 3.45% |
| BIIBBiogen Inc. Com | 3.35% | 0.04% | 3.31% |
| ALNYAlnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc. | 2.81% | 0.06% | 2.75% |
84.8% of BBH is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBH or VTI?
BBH has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BBH or VTI?
Over the past year BBH returned +47.80% vs +21.44% for VTI, so BBH leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), BBH annualized +14.63% vs +8.11% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BBH or VTI?
BBH has been the more volatile fund at 27.7% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BBH -53.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BBH and VTI?
BBH and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BBH and VTI?
At least 84.8% of BBH's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 24 positions we hold weights for in BBH and 2,787 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBH or VTI?
BBH yields 0.46% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than BBH?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. BBH led over 1Y and the full window, VTI over 3Y and 5Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.