BBH vs VTI
VanEck Biotech ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. BBH delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBH | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $394M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.47% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 26 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +15.46% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +33.95% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.28% | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.19% | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 31.0% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -72.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 20, 2011 | May 24, 2001 |
BBH vs VTI Performance
VanEck Biotech ETF (BBH) is a ETF from VanEck and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BBH returned +33.95% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, BBH is up 15.46% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Over three years, BBH compounded at +11.28% per year against +21.51% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +1.19% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, BBH has the edge at +14.31% annualized vs +8.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BBH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.0% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -72.7% for BBH and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBH charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBH currently yields 0.47% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
BBH and VTI share 17 holdings out of 2790 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBH or VTI?
BBH has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BBH or VTI?
Over the past year BBH returned +33.95% vs +22.39% for VTI, so BBH leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), BBH annualized +14.31% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BBH or VTI?
BBH has been the more volatile fund at 31.0% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BBH -72.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BBH and VTI?
BBH and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BBH and VTI?
BBH and VTI share 17 common holdings with a 1.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2790 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBH or VTI?
BBH yields 0.47% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.