BBH vs VTI
VanEck Biotech ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, BBH or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. BBH led over 1Y and the full window, VTI over 3Y and 5Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 72.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBH | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $406M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.40% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 25 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +26.27%Best | +13.14% |
| 1Y Return | +45.03%Best | +16.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.37% | +22.30%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.39% | +12.01%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 27.7% | 15.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -53.9%Best | -56.6% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,254 | $17,631Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 72.9% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 20, 2011 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 31, 2001 to Sep 23, 2026 (25.3 years).
BBH vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 25.3 years both funds cover.
BBH vs VTI Performance
VanEck Biotech ETF (BBH) is an ETF from VanEck and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BBH returned +45.03% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, BBH is up 26.27% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, BBH compounded at +16.37% per year against +22.30% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +2.39% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, BBH has the edge at +14.53% annualized vs +8.06%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BBH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.7% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.9% for BBH and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBH charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBH currently yields 0.40% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
87.9% of BBH's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.3% of VTI's money is in holdings BBH also owns.
Most of BBH is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
19 positions in common, counted across the 24 positions we hold weights for in BBH and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 25 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,131 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for BBH (96.2% of the fund), and 2 for BBH that do not appear in VTI (4.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BBH | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 15.65% | 0.29% | 15.36% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 12.87% | 0.22% | 12.65% |
| VRTXNvaesrtex Pharmaceuticals Inc | 8.51% | 0.17% | 8.34% |
| REGNRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 6.96% | 0.11% | 6.85% |
| MRNAModerna therapeutics | 6.28% | 0.03% | 6.25% |
| RVMDRevolution Medicines Inc | 5.01% | 0.05% | 4.96% |
| NTRANatera Inc | 4.93% | 0.05% | 4.88% |
| IQVI Q V I A Holdings Inc. | 4.88% | 0.05% | 4.83% |
| ILMNIllumina, Inc. | 3.17% | 0.04% | 3.13% |
| BIIBBiogen Inc. Com | 3.08% | 0.04% | 3.04% |
87.9% of BBH is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBH or VTI?
BBH has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BBH or VTI?
Over the past year BBH returned +45.03% vs +16.63% for VTI, so BBH leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), BBH annualized +14.53% vs +8.06% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BBH or VTI?
BBH has been the more volatile fund at 27.7% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BBH -53.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BBH and VTI?
BBH and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BBH and VTI?
87.9% of BBH's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.3% of VTI's is in holdings BBH also owns. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 24 positions we hold weights for in BBH and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBH or VTI?
BBH yields 0.40% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than BBH?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. BBH led over 1Y and the full window, VTI over 3Y and 5Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 72.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.