BBMC vs VTI
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Mid Cap Equity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, BBMC or VTI?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. BBMC led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. BBMC is less concentrated, with 7.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBMC | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.07% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2.1B | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.12% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 467 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +14.14%Best | +11.53% |
| 1Y Return | +18.37%Best | +15.74% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.16% | +20.67%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.76% | +11.59%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.6% | 15.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -30.1% | -25.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,531 | $17,303Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 7.7%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 14, 2020 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 15, 2020 to Sep 15, 2026 (6.4 years).
BBMC vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.4 years both funds cover.
BBMC vs VTI Performance
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BBMC returned +18.37% while VTI returned +15.74%. Year to date, BBMC is up 14.14% versus a gain of 11.53% for VTI.
Over three years, BBMC compounded at +18.16% per year against +20.67% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +7.76% and +11.59% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +18.08% annualized vs +16.64%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BBMC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.6% compared with 15.6% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.1% for BBMC and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBMC charges 0.07% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $7 vs $3 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBMC currently yields 1.12% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
93.3% of BBMC's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 6.2% of VTI's money is in holdings BBMC also owns.
Most of BBMC is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
431 positions in common, counted across the 448 positions we hold weights for in BBMC and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 467 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 747 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for BBMC (91.4% of the fund), and 8 for BBMC that do not appear in VTI (2.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BBMC | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MRNAModerna therapeutics | 1.06% | 0.03% | 1.03% |
| NTRANatera Inc | 0.94% | 0.05% | 0.89% |
| RVMDRevolution Medicines Inc | 0.81% | 0.05% | 0.76% |
| 0RMV:LNTechnipfmc Plc Ordinary Shares | 0.63% | 0.04% | 0.59% |
| OKTAOkta Inc. | 0.62% | 0.03% | 0.59% |
| CASYCaseys General | 0.59% | 0.04% | 0.55% |
| ATIAti Inc | 0.58% | 0.04% | 0.54% |
| WSMWilliams-sonoma Inc | 0.57% | 0.04% | 0.53% |
| TPRTapestry Inc. | 0.53% | 0.04% | 0.49% |
| QQnity Electronics Inc | 0.53% | 0.04% | 0.49% |
93.3% of BBMC is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBMC or VTI?
BBMC has an expense ratio of 0.07% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BBMC or VTI?
Over the past year BBMC returned +18.37% vs +15.74% for VTI, so BBMC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), BBMC annualized +16.64% vs +18.08% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BBMC or VTI?
BBMC has been the more volatile fund at 18.6% annualized versus 15.6% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BBMC -30.1% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both BBMC and VTI?
BBMC and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BBMC and VTI?
93.3% of BBMC's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 6.2% of VTI's is in holdings BBMC also owns. They hold 431 positions in common, counted across the 448 positions we hold weights for in BBMC and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBMC or VTI?
BBMC yields 1.12% while VTI yields 1.03%, so BBMC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than BBMC?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. BBMC led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. BBMC is less concentrated, with 7.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.