BBMC vs VTI
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Mid Cap Equity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. BBMC delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBMC | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.07% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2.1B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.14% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 467 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +18.52% | +13.12% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.74% | +20.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.27% | +21.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.55% | +11.84% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -30.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 14, 2020 | May 24, 2001 |
BBMC vs VTI Performance
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BBMC returned +25.74% while VTI returned +20.82%. Year to date, BBMC is up 18.52% versus a gain of 13.12% for VTI.
Over three years, BBMC compounded at +19.27% per year against +21.43% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +8.55% and +11.84% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, BBMC has the edge at +17.50% annualized vs +8.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BBMC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.1% for BBMC and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBMC charges 0.07% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $7 vs $3 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBMC currently yields 1.14% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
BBMC and VTI share 330 holdings out of 2913 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBMC or VTI?
BBMC has an expense ratio of 0.07% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $4 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BBMC or VTI?
Over the past year BBMC returned +25.74% vs +20.82% for VTI, so BBMC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), BBMC annualized +17.50% vs +8.08% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BBMC or VTI?
BBMC has been the more volatile fund at 18.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BBMC -30.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BBMC and VTI?
BBMC and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between BBMC and VTI?
BBMC and VTI share 330 common holdings with a 4.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2913 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBMC or VTI?
BBMC yields 1.14% while VTI yields 1.07%, so BBMC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.