BBMC vs IVV
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Mid Cap Equity ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BBMC or IVV?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. BBMC led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. BBMC is less concentrated, with 7.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBMC | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.07% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2.1B | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.12% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 467 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +13.50%Best | +11.03% |
| 1Y Return | +17.92%Best | +15.62% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.92% | +20.81%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.61% | +12.61%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.6% | 15.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -30.1% | -24.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,430 | $18,109Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 7.7%Best | 37.8% |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 14, 2020 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 15, 2020 to Sep 16, 2026 (6.4 years).
BBMC vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.4 years both funds cover.
BBMC vs IVV Performance
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BBMC returned +17.92% while IVV returned +15.62%. Year to date, BBMC is up 13.50% versus a gain of 11.03% for IVV.
Over three years, BBMC compounded at +17.92% per year against +20.81% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +7.61% and +12.61% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +18.27% annualized vs +16.53%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BBMC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.6% compared with 15.4% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.1% for BBMC and -24.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBMC charges 0.07% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $7 vs $3 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBMC currently yields 1.12% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
20.1% of BBMC's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 1.5% of IVV's money is in holdings BBMC also owns.
BBMC and IVV share little of their money.
69 positions in common, counted across the 448 positions we hold weights for in BBMC and 490 in IVV, against full books of 467 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 414 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for BBMC (97.2% of the fund), and 366 for BBMC that do not appear in IVV (73.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BBMC | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MRNAModerna therapeutics | 1.06% | 0.07% | 0.99% |
| CASYCaseys General | 0.59% | 0.04% | 0.55% |
| WSMWilliams-sonoma Inc | 0.57% | 0.04% | 0.53% |
| TPRTapestry Inc. | 0.53% | 0.04% | 0.49% |
| QQnity Electronics Inc | 0.53% | 0.04% | 0.49% |
| RDDTReddit Inc-Cl A | 0.44% | 0.03% | 0.41% |
| CFCf Industries Holdings Inc. | 0.42% | 0.03% | 0.39% |
| VTRSViatris Inc. | 0.39% | 0.03% | 0.36% |
| ZBRAZebra Technologies Corp | 0.36% | 0.03% | 0.33% |
| CHRWCH Robinson Worldwide | 0.36% | 0.03% | 0.33% |
20.1% of BBMC is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBMC or IVV?
BBMC has an expense ratio of 0.07% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BBMC or IVV?
Over the past year BBMC returned +17.92% vs +15.62% for IVV, so BBMC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), BBMC annualized +16.53% vs +18.27% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BBMC or IVV?
BBMC has been the more volatile fund at 18.6% annualized versus 15.4% for IVV. Worst drawdown: BBMC -30.1% vs IVV -24.5%.
Should I hold both BBMC and IVV?
BBMC and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BBMC and IVV?
20.1% of BBMC's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 1.5% of IVV's is in holdings BBMC also owns. They hold 69 positions in common, counted across the 448 positions we hold weights for in BBMC and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBMC or IVV?
BBMC yields 1.12% while IVV yields 1.06%, so BBMC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than BBMC?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. BBMC led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. BBMC is less concentrated, with 7.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.