BCCC vs QQQ
Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCCC | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $9M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 66.74% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 10 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -30.13% | +18.31% | |
| 1Y Return | -42.61% | +25.37% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.20% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 31.3% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -46.0% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 3, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BCCC vs QQQ Performance
Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BCCC returned -42.61% while QQQ returned +25.37%. Year to date, BCCC is down 30.13% versus a gain of 18.31% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BCCC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.3% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.0% for BCCC and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.26. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCCC charges 0.75% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $18 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCCC currently yields 66.74% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
BCCC and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 104 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCCC or QQQ?
BCCC has an expense ratio of 0.75% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BCCC or QQQ?
Over the past year BCCC returned -42.61% vs +25.37% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BCCC annualized -28.76% vs +13.10% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BCCC or QQQ?
BCCC has been the more volatile fund at 31.3% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: BCCC -46.0% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both BCCC and QQQ?
BCCC and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.26, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BCCC and QQQ?
BCCC and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 104 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCCC or QQQ?
BCCC yields 66.74% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so BCCC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.