BCCC vs SCHD
Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 104 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCCC | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $9M | $108.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 59.23% | 3.13% | |
| Holdings | 10 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | -21.04% | +27.67% | |
| 1Y Return | -32.67% | +29.56% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +16.53% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 34.1% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -46.0% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 3, 2025 | Oct 20, 2011 |
BCCC vs SCHD Performance
Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year BCCC returned -32.67% while SCHD returned +29.56%. Year to date, BCCC is down 21.04% versus a gain of 27.67% for SCHD.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BCCC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 34.1% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.0% for BCCC and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.05. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCCC charges 0.75% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $6 annually, a gap of $69 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCCC currently yields 59.23% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
BCCC and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 101 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCCC or SCHD?
BCCC has an expense ratio of 0.75% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $69 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BCCC or SCHD?
Over the past year BCCC returned -32.67% vs +29.56% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BCCC annualized -20.41% vs +11.55% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BCCC or SCHD?
BCCC has been the more volatile fund at 34.1% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: BCCC -46.0% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both BCCC and SCHD?
BCCC and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of -0.05, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BCCC and SCHD?
BCCC and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 101 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCCC or SCHD?
BCCC yields 59.23% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so BCCC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.