BCCC vs VYM
BCCC vs VYM
Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCCC | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $9M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 66.74% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 10 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | -28.30% | +15.80% | |
| 1Y Return | -40.27% | +26.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 31.5% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -46.0% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 3, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
BCCC vs VYM Performance
Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BCCC returned -40.27% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, BCCC is down 28.30% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BCCC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.5% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.0% for BCCC and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.04. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCCC charges 0.75% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $4 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCCC currently yields 66.74% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
BCCC and VYM share 0 holdings out of 559 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCCC or VYM?
BCCC has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $71 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BCCC or VYM?
Over the past year BCCC returned -40.27% vs +26.12% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BCCC annualized -27.45% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BCCC or VYM?
BCCC has been the more volatile fund at 31.5% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: BCCC -46.0% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both BCCC and VYM?
BCCC and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of -0.04, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BCCC and VYM?
BCCC and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 559 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCCC or VYM?
BCCC yields 66.74% while VYM yields 2.86%, so BCCC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.