BCCC vs VTI
Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCCC | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $9M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 66.74% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 10 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -29.52% | +14.16% | |
| 1Y Return | -41.92% | +23.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.33% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 31.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -46.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 3, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
BCCC vs VTI Performance
Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BCCC returned -41.92% while VTI returned +23.62%. Year to date, BCCC is down 29.52% versus a gain of 14.16% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BCCC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.0% for BCCC and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.31. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCCC charges 0.75% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCCC currently yields 66.74% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
BCCC and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2784 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCCC or VTI?
BCCC has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BCCC or VTI?
Over the past year BCCC returned -41.92% vs +23.62% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BCCC annualized -28.34% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BCCC or VTI?
BCCC has been the more volatile fund at 31.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BCCC -46.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BCCC and VTI?
BCCC and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.31, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BCCC and VTI?
BCCC and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2784 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCCC or VTI?
BCCC yields 66.74% while VTI yields 1.07%, so BCCC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.