BCCC vs VOO
Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCCC | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $9M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 59.23% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 10 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -22.24% | +13.25% | |
| 1Y Return | -33.55% | +19.96% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.81% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 33.5% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -46.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 3, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
BCCC vs VOO Performance
Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BCCC returned -33.55% while VOO returned +19.96%. Year to date, BCCC is down 22.24% versus a gain of 13.25% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BCCC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 33.5% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.0% for BCCC and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.36. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCCC charges 0.75% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCCC currently yields 59.23% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
BCCC and VOO share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCCC or VOO?
BCCC has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BCCC or VOO?
Over the past year BCCC returned -33.55% vs +19.96% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BCCC annualized -21.34% vs +13.49% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BCCC or VOO?
BCCC has been the more volatile fund at 33.5% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: BCCC -46.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both BCCC and VOO?
BCCC and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.36, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BCCC and VOO?
BCCC and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCCC or VOO?
BCCC yields 59.23% while VOO yields 1.08%, so BCCC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.