BCCC vs VXUS
Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCCC | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $9M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 59.23% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 10 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -21.04% | +15.52% | |
| 1Y Return | -32.67% | +26.73% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.35% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.40% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 34.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -46.0% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 3, 2025 | Jan 26, 2011 |
BCCC vs VXUS Performance
Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BCCC returned -32.67% while VXUS returned +26.73%. Year to date, BCCC is down 21.04% versus a gain of 15.52% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BCCC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 34.1% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.0% for BCCC and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.05. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCCC charges 0.75% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $5 annually, a gap of $70 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCCC currently yields 59.23% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
BCCC and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7870 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCCC or VXUS?
BCCC has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $70 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BCCC or VXUS?
Over the past year BCCC returned -32.67% vs +26.73% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BCCC annualized -20.41% vs +4.90% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BCCC or VXUS?
BCCC has been the more volatile fund at 34.1% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: BCCC -46.0% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both BCCC and VXUS?
BCCC and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of -0.05, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BCCC and VXUS?
BCCC and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7870 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCCC or VXUS?
BCCC yields 59.23% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so BCCC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.