BCDF vs VTI
Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCDF | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $23M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.56% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 39 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +7.92% | +14.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +6.51% | +24.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.94% | +21.12% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.0% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -27.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Horizon Kinetics LLC | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 1, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
BCDF vs VTI Performance
Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF) is a ETF from Horizon Kinetics LLC and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BCDF returned +6.51% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, BCDF is up 7.92% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.
Over three years, BCDF compounded at +15.94% per year against +21.12% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.14% annualized vs +7.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 15.0% for BCDF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.7% for BCDF and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCDF charges 0.85% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCDF currently yields 2.56% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
BCDF and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2788 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BCDF | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| BAH | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCDF or VTI?
BCDF has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BCDF or VTI?
Over the past year BCDF returned +6.51% vs +24.16% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), BCDF annualized +7.67% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BCDF or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 15.0% for BCDF. Worst drawdown: BCDF -27.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BCDF and VTI?
BCDF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BCDF and VTI?
BCDF and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2788 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCDF or VTI?
BCDF yields 2.56% while VTI yields 1.07%, so BCDF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.