BCDF vs VOO
BCDF vs VOO
Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCDF | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $23M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.56% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 39 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +7.92% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +6.51% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.94% | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.0% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -27.7% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Horizon Kinetics LLC | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 1, 2022 | Sep 7, 2010 |
BCDF vs VOO Performance
Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF) is a ETF from Horizon Kinetics LLC and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BCDF returned +6.51% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, BCDF is up 7.92% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Over three years, BCDF compounded at +15.94% per year against +21.50% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.58% annualized vs +7.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BCDF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.0% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.7% for BCDF and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCDF charges 0.85% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCDF currently yields 2.56% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
BCDF and VOO share 0 holdings out of 511 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCDF or VOO?
BCDF has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BCDF or VOO?
Over the past year BCDF returned +6.51% vs +23.71% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), BCDF annualized +7.67% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BCDF or VOO?
BCDF has been the more volatile fund at 15.0% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: BCDF -27.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both BCDF and VOO?
BCDF and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BCDF and VOO?
BCDF and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 511 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCDF or VOO?
BCDF yields 2.56% while VOO yields 1.09%, so BCDF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.