BCGD vs CNXT
Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF vs VanEck ChiNext ETF
Which is better, BCGD or CNXT?
CNXT costs less.
CNXT has a lower expense ratio. BCGD is less concentrated, with 51.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCGD | CNXT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.65%Best |
| AUM | - | $105M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.15% |
| Holdings | 80 | 196 |
| YTD Return | +4.50%Best | -5.03% |
| 1Y Return | - | +2.45% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.69% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | -1.89% |
| Top 10 Weight | 51.1%Best | 56.3% |
| Fund Family | Baron Funds | VanEck |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Dec 12, 2025 | Jul 23, 2014 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
BCGD vs CNXT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BCGD vs CNXT Performance
Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF (BCGD) is an ETF from Baron Funds and VanEck ChiNext ETF (CNXT) is an ETF from VanEck. Year to date, BCGD is up 4.50% versus a loss of 5.03% for CNXT.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCGD charges 0.75% per year while CNXT charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $65 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCGD currently yields 0.00% against 0.15% for CNXT.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 40 holdings in BCGD and 97 in CNXT, totalling 99.9% and 99.8% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in BCGD and 97 in CNXT, against full books of 80 and 196.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 0 positions for CNXT that do not appear in our book for BCGD (0.0% of the fund), and 24 for BCGD that do not appear in CNXT (63.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BCGD and CNXT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCGD or CNXT?
BCGD has an expense ratio of 0.75% while CNXT charges 0.65%. CNXT is the cheaper option, by $10 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCGD or CNXT?
BCGD yields 0.00% while CNXT yields 0.15%, so CNXT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is CNXT better than BCGD?
CNXT has a lower expense ratio. BCGD is less concentrated, with 51.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.