BCI vs SPY
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Quick Verdict
SPY has a lower expense ratio. BCI delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPY offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCI | SPY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.26% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $3.0B | $789.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 14.52% | 1.01% | |
| Holdings | 50 | 505 | |
| YTD Return | +24.59% | +14.47% | |
| 1Y Return | +38.34% | +21.96% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.15% | +21.70% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.64% | +13.30% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.3% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -32.7% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 30, 2017 | Jan 22, 1993 |
BCI vs SPY Performance
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) is a ETF from Aberdeen and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year BCI returned +38.34% while SPY returned +21.96%. Year to date, BCI is up 24.59% versus a gain of 14.47% for SPY.
Over three years, BCI compounded at +13.15% per year against +21.70% for SPY; over five years the annualized figures are +10.64% and +13.30% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, SPY has the edge at +8.87% annualized vs +7.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SPY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 14.3% for BCI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.7% for BCI and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.35. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCI charges 0.26% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $26 vs $9 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCI currently yields 14.52% against 1.01% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
BCI and SPY share 0 holdings out of 505 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCI or SPY?
BCI has an expense ratio of 0.26% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $17 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BCI or SPY?
Over the past year BCI returned +38.34% vs +21.96% for SPY, so BCI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), BCI annualized +7.14% vs +8.87% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BCI or SPY?
SPY has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 14.3% for BCI. Worst drawdown: BCI -32.7% vs SPY -56.5%.
Should I hold both BCI and SPY?
BCI and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.35, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BCI and SPY?
BCI and SPY share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 505 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCI or SPY?
BCI yields 14.52% while SPY yields 1.01%, so BCI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.