BCI vs VXUS
BCI vs VXUS
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. BCI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCI | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.26% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $3.0B | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 14.52% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 50 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +21.83% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +34.62% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.11% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.66% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -32.7% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 30, 2017 | Jan 26, 2011 |
BCI vs VXUS Performance
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) is a ETF from Aberdeen and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BCI returned +34.62% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, BCI is up 21.83% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, BCI compounded at +12.11% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +10.66% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, BCI has the edge at +6.90% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.3% for BCI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.7% for BCI and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.43. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCI charges 0.26% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $26 vs $5 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCI currently yields 14.52% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
BCI and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7863 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCI or VXUS?
BCI has an expense ratio of 0.26% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $21 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BCI or VXUS?
Over the past year BCI returned +34.62% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so BCI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), BCI annualized +6.90% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BCI or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.3% for BCI. Worst drawdown: BCI -32.7% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both BCI and VXUS?
BCI and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.43, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BCI and VXUS?
BCI and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7863 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCI or VXUS?
BCI yields 14.52% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so BCI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.