BCI vs VYM
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. BCI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCI | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.26% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $3.0B | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 14.52% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 50 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +25.31% | +16.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +38.79% | +26.05% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.39% | +18.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.76% | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.3% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -32.7% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 30, 2017 | Nov 10, 2006 |
BCI vs VYM Performance
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) is a ETF from Aberdeen and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BCI returned +38.79% while VYM returned +26.05%. Year to date, BCI is up 25.31% versus a gain of 16.16% for VYM.
Over three years, BCI compounded at +13.39% per year against +18.43% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +10.76% and +12.21% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, BCI has the edge at +7.21% annualized vs +7.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 14.3% for BCI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.7% for BCI and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCI charges 0.26% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $26 vs $4 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCI currently yields 14.52% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
BCI and VYM share 0 holdings out of 560 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCI or VYM?
BCI has an expense ratio of 0.26% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $22 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BCI or VYM?
Over the past year BCI returned +38.79% vs +26.05% for VYM, so BCI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), BCI annualized +7.21% vs +7.09% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BCI or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 14.3% for BCI. Worst drawdown: BCI -32.7% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both BCI and VYM?
BCI and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BCI and VYM?
BCI and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 560 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCI or VYM?
BCI yields 14.52% while VYM yields 2.86%, so BCI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.