BCI vs VOO
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. BCI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCI | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.26% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3.0B | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 14.52% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 50 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +25.31% | +13.44% | |
| 1Y Return | +38.79% | +22.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.39% | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.76% | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.3% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -32.7% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 30, 2017 | Sep 7, 2010 |
BCI vs VOO Performance
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) is a ETF from Aberdeen and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BCI returned +38.79% while VOO returned +22.62%. Year to date, BCI is up 25.31% versus a gain of 13.44% for VOO.
Over three years, BCI compounded at +13.39% per year against +21.47% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +10.76% and +13.27% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.55% annualized vs +7.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BCI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.3% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.7% for BCI and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.35. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCI charges 0.26% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $26 vs $3 annually, a gap of $23 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCI currently yields 14.52% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
BCI and VOO share 0 holdings out of 507 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCI or VOO?
BCI has an expense ratio of 0.26% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $23 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BCI or VOO?
Over the past year BCI returned +38.79% vs +22.62% for VOO, so BCI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), BCI annualized +7.21% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BCI or VOO?
BCI has been the more volatile fund at 14.3% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: BCI -32.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both BCI and VOO?
BCI and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.35, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BCI and VOO?
BCI and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 507 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCI or VOO?
BCI yields 14.52% while VOO yields 1.09%, so BCI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.