BCIM vs VOO
abrdn Bloomberg Industrial Metals Strategy K-1 Free ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCIM | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $26M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 10.36% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 27 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +7.79% | +14.27% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.99% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -0.31% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.4% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -43.4% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 21, 2021 | Sep 7, 2010 |
BCIM vs VOO Performance
abrdn Bloomberg Industrial Metals Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCIM) is a ETF from Aberdeen and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BCIM returned +2.99% while VOO returned +21.79%. Year to date, BCIM is up 7.79% versus a gain of 14.27% for VOO.
Over three years, BCIM compounded at -0.31% per year against +22.19% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.59% annualized vs +0.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BCIM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.4% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -43.4% for BCIM and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.35. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCIM charges 0.40% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $3 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCIM currently yields 10.36% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
BCIM and VOO share 0 holdings out of 518 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCIM or VOO?
BCIM has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $37 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BCIM or VOO?
Over the past year BCIM returned +2.99% vs +21.79% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), BCIM annualized +0.07% vs +13.59% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BCIM or VOO?
BCIM has been the more volatile fund at 20.4% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: BCIM -43.4% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both BCIM and VOO?
BCIM and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.35, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BCIM and VOO?
BCIM and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 518 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCIM or VOO?
BCIM yields 10.36% while VOO yields 1.08%, so BCIM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.