BCIM vs VXUS
abrdn Bloomberg Industrial Metals Strategy K-1 Free ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCIM | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $26M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 10.36% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 27 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +7.79% | +15.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.99% | +26.86% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -0.31% | +20.34% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.38% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -43.4% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 21, 2021 | Jan 26, 2011 |
BCIM vs VXUS Performance
abrdn Bloomberg Industrial Metals Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCIM) is a ETF from Aberdeen and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BCIM returned +2.99% while VXUS returned +26.86%. Year to date, BCIM is up 7.79% versus a gain of 15.22% for VXUS.
Over three years, BCIM compounded at -0.31% per year against +20.34% for VXUS. Across the full 4-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.89% annualized vs +0.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BCIM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.4% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -43.4% for BCIM and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCIM charges 0.40% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $5 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCIM currently yields 10.36% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
BCIM and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7882 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCIM or VXUS?
BCIM has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $35 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BCIM or VXUS?
Over the past year BCIM returned +2.99% vs +26.86% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), BCIM annualized +0.07% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BCIM or VXUS?
BCIM has been the more volatile fund at 20.4% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: BCIM -43.4% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both BCIM and VXUS?
BCIM and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BCIM and VXUS?
BCIM and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7882 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCIM or VXUS?
BCIM yields 10.36% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so BCIM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.