BCIM vs VYM
abrdn Bloomberg Industrial Metals Strategy K-1 Free ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCIM | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $26M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 10.36% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 27 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +7.79% | +16.42% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.99% | +24.22% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -0.31% | +19.03% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.4% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -43.4% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 21, 2021 | Nov 10, 2006 |
BCIM vs VYM Performance
abrdn Bloomberg Industrial Metals Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCIM) is a ETF from Aberdeen and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BCIM returned +2.99% while VYM returned +24.22%. Year to date, BCIM is up 7.79% versus a gain of 16.42% for VYM.
Over three years, BCIM compounded at -0.31% per year against +19.03% for VYM. Across the full 4-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.10% annualized vs +0.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BCIM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.4% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -43.4% for BCIM and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.41. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCIM charges 0.40% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $4 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCIM currently yields 10.36% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
BCIM and VYM share 0 holdings out of 616 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCIM or VYM?
BCIM has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BCIM or VYM?
Over the past year BCIM returned +2.99% vs +24.22% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), BCIM annualized +0.07% vs +7.10% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BCIM or VYM?
BCIM has been the more volatile fund at 20.4% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: BCIM -43.4% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both BCIM and VYM?
BCIM and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.41, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BCIM and VYM?
BCIM and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 616 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCIM or VYM?
BCIM yields 10.36% while VYM yields 2.24%, so BCIM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.