BCTK vs QQQ

BCTK vs QQQ

Which is better, BCTK or QQQ?

QQQ has been ahead.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.3%.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns (1Y): QQQLess Concentrated: QQQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBCTKQQQ
Expense Ratio0.75%0.18%Best
AUM-$483.5B
Dividend Yield0.00%0.44%
Holdings40107
YTD Return+19.73%Best+17.95%
1Y Return-+21.77%
3Y Return (annualized)-+25.63%
5Y Return (annualized)-+15.24%
Top 10 Weight59.3%46.5%Best
Fund FamilyBaron FundsInvesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionDec 12, 2025Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

BCTK vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

BCTK vs QQQ Performance

Baron Technology ETF (BCTK) is an ETF from Baron Funds and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, BCTK is up 19.73% versus a gain of 17.95% for QQQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BCTK charges 0.75% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $18 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCTK currently yields 0.00% against 0.44% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

BCTK already in QQQ60.8%
QQQ already in BCTK39.0%

60.8% of BCTK's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 39.0% of QQQ's money is in holdings BCTK also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

17 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in BCTK and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 40 and 107.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 80 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for BCTK (59.4% of the fund), and 16 for BCTK that do not appear in QQQ (25.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BCTKWeight in QQQDifference
NVDANvidia Corp6.76%8.44%1.68%
AVGOBroadcom Inc6.98%3.16%3.82%
GOOGAlphabet Inc6.34%3.13%3.21%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc4.64%4.67%0.03%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.4.66%4.43%0.23%
LRCXLrcx Uw Equity6.55%1.69%4.86%
SPCXSpace Exploration Technologies6.39%0.91%5.48%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc2.55%3.45%0.90%
TSLATesla Inc3.05%2.56%0.49%
SHOP:CAShopify Inc3.45%0.77%2.68%

60.8% of BCTK is already inside QQQ.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

BCTKQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BCTK or QQQ?

BCTK has an expense ratio of 0.75% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between BCTK and QQQ?

60.8% of BCTK's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 39.0% of QQQ's is in holdings BCTK also owns. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in BCTK and 102 in QQQ.

Which pays a higher dividend, BCTK or QQQ?

BCTK yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than BCTK?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.