BCTK vs VOO

BCTK vs VOO

Which is better, BCTK or VOO?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.3%.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns (1Y): VOOLess Concentrated: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBCTKVOO
Expense Ratio0.75%0.03%Best
AUM-$997.4B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.04%
Holdings40509
YTD Return+19.73%Best+12.37%
1Y Return-+16.61%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.37%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.49%
Top 10 Weight59.3%37.6%Best
Fund FamilyBaron FundsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionDec 12, 2025Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

BCTK vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

BCTK vs VOO Performance

Baron Technology ETF (BCTK) is an ETF from Baron Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, BCTK is up 19.73% versus a gain of 12.37% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BCTK charges 0.75% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCTK currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

BCTK already in VOO57.6%
VOO already in BCTK25.9%

57.6% of BCTK's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 25.9% of VOO's money is in holdings BCTK also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

20 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in BCTK and 494 in VOO, against full books of 40 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 467 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for BCTK (73.3% of the fund), and 12 for BCTK that do not appear in VOO (25.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BCTKWeight in VOODifference
NVDANvidia Corp6.76%7.55%0.79%
AVGOBroadcom Inc6.98%2.86%4.12%
GOOGAlphabet Inc6.34%2.62%3.72%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc4.64%4.13%0.51%
LRCXLrcx Uw Equity6.55%0.57%5.98%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.4.66%1.44%3.22%
TSLATesla Inc3.05%1.36%1.69%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc2.55%1.21%1.34%
METAMeta Platforms Inc1.03%1.90%0.87%
COHRCoherent Corp2.78%0.08%2.70%

57.6% of BCTK is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

BCTKVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BCTK or VOO?

BCTK has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between BCTK and VOO?

57.6% of BCTK's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 25.9% of VOO's is in holdings BCTK also owns. They hold 20 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in BCTK and 494 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, BCTK or VOO?

BCTK yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than BCTK?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.