BFJL vs VOO

BFJL vs VOO

Which is better, BFJL or VOO?

Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBFJLVOO
Expense Ratio0.90%0.03%Best
AUM$4M$997.4B
Dividend Yield1.31%1.04%
Holdings18509
YTD Return+4.90%+14.14%Best
1Y Return-5.19%+17.31%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+23.16%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.85%
Volatility (annualized)13.4%12.3%Best
Max Drawdown-21.3%-8.9%Best
$10,000 over 1.2 years$9,811$12,644Best
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleMulti AlternativeLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJun 30, 2025Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 1, 2025 to Sep 21, 2026 (1.2 years).

BFJL vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.2 years both funds cover.

BFJL vs VOO Performance

FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July (BFJL) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BFJL returned -5.19% while VOO returned +17.31%. Year to date, BFJL is up 4.90% versus a gain of 14.14% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

BFJL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.4% compared with 12.3% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.3% for BFJL and -8.9% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.18. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BFJL charges 0.90% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $90 vs $3 annually, a gap of $87 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BFJL currently yields 1.31% against 1.04% for VOO.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BFJL and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BFJLVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BFJL or VOO?

BFJL has an expense ratio of 0.90% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $87 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, BFJL or VOO?

Over the past year BFJL returned -5.19% vs +17.31% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BFJL annualized -1.58% vs +21.59% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, BFJL or VOO?

BFJL has been the more volatile fund at 13.4% annualized versus 12.3% for VOO. Worst drawdown: BFJL -21.3% vs VOO -8.9%.

Should I hold both BFJL and VOO?

BFJL and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.18, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, BFJL or VOO?

BFJL yields 1.31% while VOO yields 1.04%, so BFJL currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than BFJL?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.